Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Philadelphia-Detroit Lines, Inc. v. Simpson, State Road Commissioner, et al., 1941 — 312 U.S. 655 · caselaw · US
General
Philadelphia-Detroit Lines, Inc. v. Simpson, State Road Commissioner, et al.
312 U.S. 655·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 708.
Philadelphia-Detroit Lines, Inc. v. Simpson, State Road Commissioner, et al.
February 10, 1941.
Messrs. Leo P. Kitchen and Dan R. Schwartz for appellant. Messrs. Clarence W. Meadows, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Robert S. Spilman for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Maurer v. Hamilton, 309 U. S. 598, 603-604; South Carolina Highway Dept. v. Barnwell Bros., 303 U. S. 177.