Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Leslie F. BRAND and Emily A. Brand, Appellees, 1928 — 30 F.2d 1007 · caselaw · US
Corporations
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Leslie F. BRAND and Emily A. Brand, Appellees
30 F.2d 1007·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Leslie F. BRAND and Emily A. Brand, Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
October 25, 1928.
No. 2776.
Nesbitt, Goodwin & Nesbitt, of Wheeling, W. Va., for appellant.
O’Brien & O’Brien, of Wheeling, W.'Va., for ajopellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed, at cost of appellant, on joint motion.