General
Roscoe Rollins, Respondent, v. Daniel Frankel and Margaret LeFranc Frankel, Appellants
261 A.D. 946·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1941·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Roscoe Rollins, Respondent, v. Daniel Frankel and Margaret LeFranc Frankel, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.