Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CALLENDER et al. v. FLORIDA, 1966 — 383 U.S. 270 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
CALLENDER et al. v. FLORIDA
383 U.S. 270·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CALLENDER et al. v. FLORIDA.
No. 58,
October Term, 1964.
Order and judgment of April 26, 1965, vacated.
Decided February 28, 1966.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The mandate of this Court in this case issued on the 21st day of May, 1965, is hereby recalled and the judgment heretofore entered on the 26th day of April, 1965, is hereby vacated. The order of the Court dated the 26th day of April, 1965, granting the writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated.
Treating the papers submitted as a petition for a writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgments are reversed. Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U. S. 454; Abernathy v. Alabama, 380 U. S. 447.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.