Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Appraisal of the Estate of Mary N. Pettit, Deceased, under the Transfer Tax Act. The Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant; Dorothea M. Pettit et al., Respondents, 1902 — 171 N.Y. 654 · caselaw · US
Tax
In the Matter of the Appraisal of the Estate of Mary N. Pettit, Deceased, under the Transfer Tax Act. The Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant; Dorothea M. Pettit et al., Respondents
171 N.Y. 654·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Appraisal of the Estate of Mary N. Pettit, Deceased, under the Transfer Tax Act. The Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant; Dorothea M. Pettit et al., Respondents.
Matter of Pettit, 65 App. Div. 80, affirmed.
(Argued May 6, 1902;
decided May 20, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made November 8, 1901, which reversed an order of the New York County Surrogate’s Court imposing a transfer tax upon the estate of Mary N. Pettit, deceased.
Emmet R. Olcott for appellant.
Lucius H. Beers and Jordan J. Rollins for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ.