Contracts · MBE-tested
Edward M. Kenney et al. v. Planning and Zoning Board of the Town of Greenwich et al.
212 Conn. 808·Connecticut Supreme Court·1989·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward M. Kenney et al. v. Planning and Zoning Board of the Town of Greenwich et al.
William H. Narwold, in support of the petition.
Eugene J. Ricdo mdKariA. Pederson, in opposition.
Decided August 1, 1989
[MAJORITY]
The defendants Daniel and Janet Barber’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 18 Conn. App. 549, is granted. It is further ordered that the matter be remanded to the Appellate Court for reconsideration in light of this court’s decision in Spicer v. Zoning Commission, 212 Conn. 875.