General
Richard D'Arcangelo et al., Plaintiffs v. Robert L. Burnett, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Raymond F. Scott, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant
52 A.D.2d 724·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1976·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Richard D’Arcangelo et al., Plaintiffs v Robert L. Burnett, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Raymond F. Scott, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[MAJORITY]
Order unanimously affirmed. Same memorandum as in D’Arcangelo v Burnett (52 AD2d 723). (Appeal from order of Steuben Supreme Court denying motion to set aside verdict.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Mahoney and Goldman, JJ.