Contracts · MBE-tested
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; Maryland Port Authority et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.
372 U.S. 902·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 97. No. 98. No. 99.
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; Maryland Port Authority et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.
Thomas E. Dewey on the motion for enlargement of time for oral argument.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 370 U. S. 914.) The motion of John H. Colgren for leave to withdraw his appearance as counsel for appellees is granted. The motion for enlargement of time for oral argument is granted and 45 additional minutes are allotted to each side. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.