Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MITCHELL, SECRETARY OF LABOR, v. OREGON FROZEN FOODS CO. et al., 1960 — 361 U.S. 231 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
MITCHELL, SECRETARY OF LABOR, v. OREGON FROZEN FOODS CO. et al.
361 U.S. 2314 L. Ed. 2d 267·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or. decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MITCHELL, SECRETARY OF LABOR, v. OREGON FROZEN FOODS CO. et al.
No. 33.
Argued November 17, 1959.
Decided January 11, 1960.
Bessie Margolin argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Wayne G. Barnett, Harold C. Nystrom and Sylvia S. Ellison.
Martin P. Gallagher argued .the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Orval Yokom.
Edward Brown Williams filed a brief for the National Association of Frozen Food Packers, as amicus curiae, in support of respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
In view of ambiguities in the record as to the issues sought to be tendered, made apparent in. oral argument and the memoranda of counsel subsequently filed at the Court’s request, the writ of. certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or. decision of this case.