Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Crummer Company et al. v. Barker, U. S. District Judge, 1951 — 342 U.S. 897 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Crummer Company et al. v. Barker, U. S. District Judge
342 U.S. 897·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the. consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 323.
Crummer Company et al. v. Barker, U. S. District Judge.
Robert J. Pleus, Chris Dixie and Joseph P. Lea, Jr. for petitioners.
Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, Ralph McLane, Assistant" Attorney General, Charles R. Scótt, Henry P. Adair, Donald Russell and H. M. Voorhis for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the. consideration or decision of this application.