Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Citizens' National Bank of Adams, Appellant, v. Harrison Fuller, Respondent, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 728 · caselaw · US
General
The Citizens' National Bank of Adams, Appellant, v. Harrison Fuller, Respondent
158 N.Y. 728·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Citizens’ National Bank of Adams, Appellant, v. Harrison Fuller, Respondent.
(Argued March 9, 1899;
decided April 18, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 8, 1896, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial without a jury, and granting a new trial.
Citizens’ Nat. Bank of Adams v. Dwight, 9 App. Div. 630, affirmed.
John Bansung for appellant.
■ E. O. Emerson and Henry Pur cell for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, and judgment absolute ordered for defendant on the stipulation, with costs, on authority of Sinclair v. Fuller (158 N. Y. 607).