Admiralty
MONAD ENGINEERING CO. v. CHARLES KILLAM & CO.
216 F. 444·United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania·1914
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MONAD ENGINEERING CO. v. CHARLES KILLAM & CO.
(District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.
August 14, 1914.)
No. 74.
In Admiralty. Suit by the Monad Engineering Company against Charles Killam & Co. Heard on libel, answer, and trial proofs.
Decree for respondent.
Harris S. Sparhawk, of Philadelphia, Pa., for libelant.
Lewis, Adler & Laws, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — DICKINSON, District Judge.]
DICKINSON, District Judge.
On the findings of fact and conclusions of law and the opinion filed in the case of Charles Killam & Co. v. Monad Engineering Co., 216 Fed. 438 (in Admiralty, No. 59 of 1907), the cross-libel is dismissed, with costs to the respondent.