Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Galban and Company, Appellants, v. The United States, 1907 — 207 U.S. 579 · caselaw · US
General
Galban and Company, Appellants, v. The United States
207 U.S. 579·Supreme Court of the United States·1907
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 14.
Galban and Company, Appellants, v. The United States.
Appeal from the Court of Claims.
Submitted October 15, 1907.
Decided October 21, 1907.
Mr. Barry Mohun, Mr. W. W. Dudley and Mr. L. T. Michener for appellants. The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Van Orsdel for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed. Nealy v. Henkel, 180 U. S. 109; Pearcy v. Stranahan, 205 U. S. 257, and cases Cited. See opinion below, 40 C. Cl. 495.