Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George A. Fuller Company, Petitioner, v. Otis Elevator Company, 1916 — 241 U.S. 665 · caselaw · US
General
George A. Fuller Company, Petitioner, v. Otis Elevator Company
241 U.S. 665·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 909.
George A. Fuller Company, Petitioner, v. Otis Elevator Company.
April 10, 1916.
Mr. Edward S. Duvall, Jr., for the petitioner. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and Mr. John Spalding Flannery for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia granted.