General
Julius Lichtenstein et al., Respondents, v. Robert M. Jarvis et al., Appellants
164 N.Y. 601·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Julius Lichtenstein et al., Respondents, v. Robert M. Jarvis et al., Appellants.
Lichtenstein v. Jarvis, 31 App. Div. 33, affirmed.
(Argued October 25, 1900;
decided November 13, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 11, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
W. J. Townsend for appellants.
Abram Fling for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
J udgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker; Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, "Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.