Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Susie A. STEWART, Otherwise Known as Mrs. C. J. Stewart, Appellant, v. Martha Young CASS, Appellee, 1930 — 38 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
General
Susie A. STEWART, Otherwise Known as Mrs. C. J. Stewart, Appellant, v. Martha Young CASS, Appellee
38 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Susie A. STEWART, Otherwise Known as Mrs. C. J. Stewart, Appellant, v. Martha Young CASS, Appellee.
No. 5971.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 21, 1930.
Louis K. Pratt, of Fairbanks, Alaska, and Herman Weinberger, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Thomas B. Drayton, of Fairbanks, Alaska, for appellee.
Before DIETRICH and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and NETERER, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
No debatable question of law appearing on the record, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.