General
KING v. GREENBLATT et al.
396 U.S. 26·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KING v. GREENBLATT et al.
No. 615,
Misc.
Decided November 10, 1969
Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and John Wall and Edward W. Hanley III, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.