Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Margaret S. Theall, Appellant, v. The Village of Port Chester, Respondent, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 602 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Margaret S. Theall, Appellant, v. The Village of Port Chester, Respondent
186 N.Y. 602·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret S. Theall, Appellant, v. The Village of Port Chester, Respondent.
Theall v. Village of Port Chester, 110 App. Div. 776, affirmed.
(Argued November 26, 1906;
decided December 11, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 26, 1906, upon an order reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term and directing a dismissal of the complaint in an action to compel the specific performance of a contract'to purchase certain lands.
Ralph E. Prime for appellant.
Jerome A. Peeh for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.