Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
O'CONNOR v. OHIO, 1965 — 382 U.S. 286 · caselaw · US
General
O'CONNOR v. OHIO
382 U.S. 286·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
O'CONNOR v. OHIO.
No. 281,
Misc.
Decided December 13, 1965.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for rehearing is granted and the order of October 11, 1965, insofar as it denies certiorari, is vacated. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari, is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Ohio for further proceedings in light of Griffin v. California, 380 U. S. 609.