General
Lauris Tendrup, Respondent, v. The John Stephenson Company (Limited), Appellant
121 N.Y. 681·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur, except Earl, J., dissenting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lauris Tendrup, Respondent, v. The John Stephenson Company (Limited), Appellant.
(Argued April 29, 1890;
decided June 3, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme ■Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made February 4,1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
John Notrnan for appellant.
J. Edward Swamstrom for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Earl, J., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.