Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John P. CARROLL, Petitioner, v. Honorable Morris A. SOPER, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, Respondent, 1931 — 48 F.2d 1071 · caselaw · US
General
John P. CARROLL, Petitioner, v. Honorable Morris A. SOPER, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, Respondent
48 F.2d 1071·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John P. CARROLL, Petitioner, v. Honorable Morris A. SOPER, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, Respondent.
No. 3113.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Jan. 28, 1931.
John P. Carroll, of Leavenworth, Kan., per se.
O. N. Forrest and Raphael I. Levin, Asst. U. S. Attys., both of Baltimore, Md., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Petition for writ of mandamus denied.