Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re RIZNIKOVE, 1924 — 3 F.2d 81 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
In re RIZNIKOVE
3 F.2d 81·United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re RIZNIKOVE.
(District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.
May, 1924.)
No. 9884.
Bankruptcy <§=5368 — Trustee cannot be allowed additional fees for services rendered after composition.
Where, after confirmation of a composition, the trustee has received the commission provided by Bankruptcy Act § 48a (Comp. St. § 9632), the court is without power to allow him further compensation for services subsequently rendered on behalf of the creditors.
In Bankruptcy. In the Matter of Abe Riznikove, bankrupt. On petition by trustee for additional compensation.
Dismissed.
Thomas H. Armstrong, of Farrell, Pa., for bankrupt.
Roy Neville, of Sharon, Pa., for petitioning creditors.
[MAJORITY — SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.]
SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.
A composition offer of bankrupt, calling for the payment of 55 per cent, of claims against the estate, payable 25 per cent, in cash and 30 per eent. in two years, secured by mortgage on joint real estate of bankrupt and his wife, was confirmed absolutely by the court on March 28, 1922. This mortgage was in fact a third lien on the property in question.
Upon the confirmation of the composition, the trustee was allowed and received the compensation fixed by section 48a of the national Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9632) for trustees upon confirmation 'of composition. He now seeks additional compensation for service rendered after the date of the composition in securing bidders to bid on the property covered by the said mortgage, when* that property was sold by the sheriff of Mercer county at sheriff’s sale in January, 1924, upon executions issued on judgment recovered on prior mortgage liens. By the efforts of the trustee bids were secured on said real estate, which, after paying off all prior liens, netted for the mortgage the sum of $2,420.22, securing the 30 per cent, of the composition offer. The trustee asks that the matter be referred to the referee in bankruptcy to determine the amount of- the fee, if any, to which the trustee would be entitled for this service.
This would be a very proper procedure; if there was any law allowing fees to the trustee for services such as he has rendered in the instant case to the creditors, whose 30 per cent, was secured by the mortgage lien, but unfortunately this court is entirely without jurisdiction to grant the prayer of the petition. The fees for trustee on confirmation of composition are fixed by law, those have been allowed, and the court is without power to allow additional compensation. The trustee in the brief filed in this case has drawn our attention to cases holding that on confirmation of composition the case is not dismissed until the consideration provided shall have been paid. Granting this to be true, yet the law fixe'd the compensation going to a trustee on confirmation of composition, and the court cannot grant more.
The petition for additional compensation may be dismissed.