Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Mutual Benefit, Health & Accident Assn. v. Bowman
304 U.S. 549·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1004.
Mutual Benefit, Health & Accident Assn. v. Bowman.
Decided May 31, 1938.
Messrs. John S. Leahy, Philip E. Horan, and William & Michaels for petitioner.
No appearance for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted limited to the question of the right of respondent to recover under the law of New Mexico. The judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals for determination of thp question presented. Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, ante, p. 64; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Jackson, ante, p. 261; Rosenthal v. New York Life Ins. Co., ante, p. 263.