Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
W. E. Trenchard et al., Appellants, v. F. Kell et al., 1906 — 202 U.S. 613 · caselaw · US
General
W. E. Trenchard et al., Appellants, v. F. Kell et al.
202 U.S. 613·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 631.
W. E. Trenchard et al., Appellants, v. F. Kell et al.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina.
Motion to dismiss submitted April 30, 1906.
Decided May 14, 1906.
Mr. Williamson W. Fuller and Mr. Herbert Noble for appellants.
Mr. F. H. Busbee and Mr. . Robert M. Hughes for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Maynard v. Hecht, 151 U. S. 324; Colvin v. Jacksonville, 158 U. S. 456; The Bayonne, 159 U. S. 687; United States v. Rider, 163 U. S. 132, 139; Chamberlin v. Peoria &c. Ry. Co., 118 Fed. Rep. 32, and cases cited.