Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Patrick J. Gleason et al., Respondents, v. The Peerless Manufacturing Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 574 · caselaw · US
General
Patrick J. Gleason et al., Respondents, v. The Peerless Manufacturing Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
163 N.Y. 574·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Patrick J. Gleason et al., Respondents, v. The Peerless Manufacturing Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Gleason v. Peerless Mfg. Co., 1 App. Div. 257,’ affirmed.
(Argued Hay 7, 1900;
decided May 22, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division o.f the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 18, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Hat/ian Ottinger for appellant.
George W. Stephens for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Yann and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.