Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Selinger v. Bigler, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service, et al., 1967 — 389 U.S. 904 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Selinger v. Bigler, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service, et al.
389 U.S. 904·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that cer-tiorari should be granted. · Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 313.
Selinger v. Bigler, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service, et al.
David R. Frazer for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Joseph M. Howard and Burton Berkley for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that cer-tiorari should be granted.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.