General
James H. Bailey, Respondent, v. The Inter-state Casualty Company of New York, Appellant
158 N.Y. 723·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., and Gray, J., dissenting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James H. Bailey, Respondent, v. The Inter-state Casualty Company of New York, Appellant.
(Argued March 6, 1899;
decided March 24, 1899.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 11,1896, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint upon the merits on trial at Circuit, and granting a new trial.
Bailey v. Inter-state Casualty Co., 8 App. Div. 127, affirmed.
Henry Thompson and Yanderpoél, Cuming d? Goodwin for appellant.
FranTdin A. Rowe for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., and Gray, J., dissenting.