Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Johan G. Johnson, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant, 1895 — 144 N.Y. 719 · caselaw · US
General
Johan G. Johnson, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant
144 N.Y. 719·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Johan G. Johnson, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued January 25, 1895;
decided February 8, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made August 1, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.
William O. Beecher for appellant.
J. Fdward Swaipstrom for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm, with ten per cent damages under section 3251 of the Code of Civil Procedure; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.