General
The Third National Bank of Syracuse, Respondent, v. Arthur J. Keeffe et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others
171 N.Y. 647·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Third National Bank of Syracuse, Respondent, v. Arthur J. Keeffe et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
Third Nat. Bank of Syracuse v. Keeffe, 55 App. Div. 640, affirmed.
(Argued April 14, 1902;
decided May 6, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered Rovember 30, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Louis Marshall for appellants.
George W. O'Brien and E. N. Wilson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ.; Gray, J., dissenting upon the ground that error was committed in receiving Elizabeth Keeffe’s evidence ; O’Brien, J., dissenting generally ; Vann, J., taking no part.