Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William H. MAXWELL and Globe Indemnity Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error, 1925 — 5 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
General
William H. MAXWELL and Globe Indemnity Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
5 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William H. MAXWELL and Globe Indemnity Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
February 11, 1925.)
No. 2268.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of South Carolina, at Charleston.
Judgment of District Court (3 F.[2d] 906), affirmed.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Writ of error from Supreme Court allowed.