Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph W. Fiske, Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Appellants, 1893 — 138 N.Y. 630 · caselaw · US
General
Joseph W. Fiske, Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Appellants
138 N.Y. 630·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph W. Fiske, Appellant, v. The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Appellants.
(Argued March 16, 1893;
decided May 5, 1893.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, made April 28, 1892, which reversed judgments in favor of plaintiff and the defendants Andrew L. Smith, and others, entered upon the report of a referee, and granted a new trial.
John Brooks Leavitt and Albert II. Atterbv/ry for appellants.
Dudley R. Horton for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed, and judgment absolute on stipulation.