Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Leonard R. Coates, Plaintiff in Error, v. The District of Columbia, 1916 — 239 U.S. 636 · caselaw · US
Securities
Leonard R. Coates, Plaintiff in Error, v. The District of Columbia
239 U.S. 636·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 156.
Leonard R. Coates, Plaintiff in Error, v. The District of Columbia.
In error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Argued January 7, 10, 1916.
Decided January 17, 1916.
Mr. Francis P. B. Sands for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. R. L. Williams (by special leave) and Mr. Conrad H. Syme for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of American Security & Trust Co. v. District of Columbia, 224 U. S. 491; District of Columbia v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington R. R., 232 U. S. 716; Washington & Mt. Vernon Ry. v. Downey, 236 U. S. 190.