Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Levy et al., Respondents, v. The Great Western Railroad Company, Appellant, 1872 — 48 N.Y. 675 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
John Levy et al., Respondents, v. The Great Western Railroad Company, Appellant
48 N.Y. 675·New York Commission of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Levy et al., Respondents, v. The Great Western Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued September 28, 1871;
decided January term, 1872.)
Action to recover damages for injuries sustained by Louisa Levy, in crossing defendant’s tracks. Held, that she was chargeable with contributory negligence, according to the rule laid down in Gorton v. The Erie Railway Com/pamy (43 R. Y., 660).
John H. Reynolds for the appellant.
Amasa J. Parker for the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Leonard and Earl, CC., read for reversal.
All concur.
. Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event.