General
C & G BOAT COMPANY, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CRESCENT RIVER PORT PILOTS ASSOCIATION et al., Defendants-Appellees
456 F.2d 1290·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1972
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
C & G BOAT COMPANY, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CRESCENT RIVER PORT PILOTS ASSOCIATION et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 71-3264
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 22, 1972.
George B. Matthews, H. Barton Williams, Samuel C. Gainsburgh, Maurice L. Burk, H. Alva Brumfield, New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Joseph W. Nelkin, New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellees.
Thomas J. Wyllie, New Orleans, La., for Falco, Inc.
Robert B. Aeomb, Jr., New Orleans, La., for Citronelle.
P. A. Bienvenu, New Orleans, La., for Sun Oil.
Nigel E. Rafferty, New Orleans, La., for Hess Oil, etc.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; Bee Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
PER CURIAM:
We conclude that the judgment of the district court in this matter is correct. See C & G Boat Co., Inc., et al. v. Crescent River Port Pilots Association, et al., E.D.La.1972.
Affirmed.