Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, a Corporation, Appellee, 1932 — 58 F.2d 1085 · caselaw · US
Corporations
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, a Corporation, Appellee
58 F.2d 1085·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, a Corporation, Appellee.
No. 6827.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 6, 1932.
James E. Lyons and Burton Mason, both of San Francisco, Cal., and Robert Brennan, M. W. Reed, Frank Karr, and R. E. Wedekind, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.
Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon motion of counsel for appellants, ordered appeal herein dismissed; mandate forthwith.