Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James C. Murphy, Appellant, v. Supreme Council of the Catholic Mutual Benefit Association, Respondent, 1902 — 172 N.Y. 659 · caselaw · US
General
James C. Murphy, Appellant, v. Supreme Council of the Catholic Mutual Benefit Association, Respondent
172 N.Y. 659·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James C. Murphy, Appellant, v. Supreme Council of the Catholic Mutual Benefit Association, Respondent.
. Murphy v. Supreme Council C. M. B. A., 51 App. Div. 618, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted November 10, 1902;
decided December 2, 1902.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 3, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appellant was in default in having failed to pay certain costs which he. had been directed to pay by a previous order of this court.
John J. Hynes for motion.
Edtmund P. Cottle opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs of appeal, but with ten dollars costs of motion. .