Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ESTATE of Sumner GERARD et al., Appellants. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee, 1975 — 513 F.2d 1232 · caselaw · US
Tax
ESTATE of Sumner GERARD et al., Appellants. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee
513 F.2d 1232·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ESTATE of Sumner GERARD et al., Appellants. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee.
No. 890, Docket 74-2005.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued March 27, 1975.
Decided April 9, 1975.
Robert D. Whoriskey, New York City (Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle, John P. Campbell, Alan S. Berlin, New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
Gary R. Allen, Washington, D. C. (Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gilbert E. Andrews, Wynette J. Hewett, Attys., Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C.), for appellee.
Before MULLIGAN and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges, and THOMSEN, District Judge.
Of the United States District Court, District of Maryland, sitting by designation.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from an order of the Tax Court finding a deficiency in the estate tax of the Estate of Sumner Gerard. That portion of the deficiency in issue on this appeal (approximately $482,000) is based on the determination that the decedent, Sumner Gerard, gave certain property as a gift in contemplation of death within the meaning of Section 2035 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. We affirm on the opinion of Judge Quealy of the Tax Court reported at 57 T.C. 749 (1972).