General
United States Restaurant and Realty Company, Plaintiff, v. David A. Schulte and Rose Schulte, Comprising the Firm of Schulte & Company, Defendants. In the Matter of the Motion for Substitution of Anton H. Meyer, as Assignee of the United States Restaurant and Realty Company, for Benefit of Creditors, Respondent; Norbert Heinsheimer, Appellant
143 A.D. 906·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1911·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
United States Restaurant and Realty Company, Plaintiff, v. David A. Schulte and Rose Schulte, Comprising the Firm of Schulte & Company, Defendants. In the Matter of the Motion for Substitution of Anton H. Meyer, as Assignee of the United States Restaurant and Realty Company, for Benefit of Creditors, Respondent; Norbert Heinsheimer, Appellant.—
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.