Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Samuel V. Abel, Appellant, v. Henry Bischoff, Jr., et al., Individually and as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of Henry Bischoff, Deceased, Respondents, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 608 · caselaw · US
Tax
Samuel V. Abel, Appellant, v. Henry Bischoff, Jr., et al., Individually and as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of Henry Bischoff, Deceased, Respondents
185 N.Y. 608·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel V. Abel, Appellant, v. Henry Bischoff, Jr., et al., Individually and as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of Henry Bischoff, Deceased, Respondents.
(Submitted June 11, 1906;
decided June 19, 1906.)
Motion to amend remittitur. (See 185 N. Y. 568.)
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
We think the meaning and effect of the decision heretofore rendered by us is perfectly clear. The judgment of the Appellate Division was affirmed with one modification only, by which the plaintiff was permitted, on taking title, to pay $105,000 of the purchase money by a mortgage payable four months from date of closing title, with interest at five per cent. In all other respects the plaintiff, as a condition for obtaining title, must comply with the terms of the judgment of the Appellate Division, which charge him with interest on the whole of the unpaid purchase money of $135,000 from May 4th, 1903, and credit him with the amount of rents received, less the taxes and insurance thereon paid by defendants since said May 4th, 1903.
The motion to amend the remittitur should be denied, with ten dollars costs.
Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Hiscock and Chase, JJ., concur; Gray and O’Brien, JJ., absent.
Motion denied.