Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Caroline Smith, as General Guardian of Elizabeth Roessner, an Infant, Respondent, v. Lawrence P. Mingey, Appellant, 1902 — 172 N.Y. 650 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of Caroline Smith, as General Guardian of Elizabeth Roessner, an Infant, Respondent, v. Lawrence P. Mingey, Appellant
172 N.Y. 650·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Caroline Smith, as General Guardian of Elizabeth Roessner, an Infant, Respondent, v. Lawrence P. Mingey, Appellant.
Matter of Smith v. Mingey, 72 App. Div. 103, affirmed.
(Submitted November 11, 1902;
decided November 25, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 26, 1902, which affirmed an order of Special Term directing the appellant herein to pay to Elizabeth Roessner a certain sum of money found to be due to her from him.
George 11. BalTcam and Thomas J. Purdy for appellant.
Lawrence E. Brown for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Cli. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Cullen, JJ. Absent: Vann, J.