Contracts · MBE-tested

CENTRAL MAGAZINE SALES, LTD. v. UNITED STATES

389 U.S. 5019 L. Ed. 2d 49·Supreme Court of the United States·1967

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

CENTRAL MAGAZINE SALES, LTD. v. UNITED STATES. No. 368. Decided October 23, 1967. Richard Lipsitz for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Jerome M. Feit for the United States. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767. [CONCURRENCE — Mr. Justice Harlan] Mr. Justice Harlan concurs in the judgment of reversal upon the premises stated in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455, 457. The Chief Justice believes this case is controlled by Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, and the judgment should be affirmed in accordance with the principles enunciated in the opinion of the Court in that case. Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.