Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of George ANDERSON, for the Return of ½ Doz. 16 oz. Glasses, etc.; George ANDERSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1930 — 44 F.2d 953 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Petition of George ANDERSON, for the Return of ½ Doz. 16 oz. Glasses, etc.; George ANDERSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
44 F.2d 953·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of George ANDERSON, for the Return of ½ Doz. 16 oz. Glasses, etc. George ANDERSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 6185.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 17, 1930.
George D. Toole and C. S. Wagner, both of Butte, Mont., for appellant.
Wellington D. Rankin, U. S. Atty., and Howard A. Johnson and Arthur P. Acher, Asst. U. S. Atty., all of Helena, Mont.
Before RUDKIN and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and JAMES, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Reversed on authority of Ryan v. United States (C. C. A.) 44 F.(2d) 951, just decided.