Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Forman et al. v. City of Montgomery, 1966 — 384 U.S. 1009 · caselaw · US
General
Forman et al. v. City of Montgomery
384 U.S. 1009·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1556,
Misc.
Forman et al. v. City of Montgomery.
William M. Kunstler, Arthur Kinoy, Martin M. Berger, John E. Thorne, Joseph Levin and Charles S. Conley for petitioners. Matthis W. Piel and Walter J. Knabe for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.