Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Buckley et al. v. Johnson et al., 1971 — 401 U.S. 970 · caselaw · US
General
Buckley et al. v. Johnson et al.
401 U.S. 970·Supreme Court of the United States·1971
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that stay should be denied. Motion of Rita Johnson et al. to expedite appeal denied.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No.-.
Buckley et al. v. Johnson et al.
[MAJORITY]
Application for stay of order of United States District Court for the District of Connecticut entered in Civil Action No. 13432 on November 20, 1970, which application was presented to Mr. Justice Harlan, and by him referred to the Court, granted, and said order hereby stayed pending timely filing of appeal in this Court. Should appeal be so timely filed, stay will remain in effect pending its disposition. In event appeal is dismissed, stay to terminate automatically. Should jurisdiction be noted or postponed, stay to remain in effect pending issuance of judgment of this Court.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that stay should be denied. Motion of Rita Johnson et al. to expedite appeal denied.