Torts · MBE-tested
Paul De Marco, Individually, and as Natural Guardian of Muriel De Marco, an Infant, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lomart Industries, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Muriel De Marco et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants
64 A.D.2d 660·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1978·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Paul De Marco, Individually, and as Natural Guardian of Muriel De Marco, an Infant, et al., Plaintiffs, v Lomart Industries, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Muriel De Marco et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 28, 1977, which denied their motion to dismiss the third-party complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements, upon the opinion of Mr. Justice Brownstein at Special Term. Titone, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.