Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jack Kenneth DAVIS, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA., 2013 — 134 S. Ct. 659 · caselaw · US
General
Jack Kenneth DAVIS, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.
134 S. Ct. 659187 L. Ed. 2d 435·Supreme Court of the United States·2013
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jack Kenneth DAVIS, petitioner,
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 13-6866.
Supreme Court of the United States
Nov. 18, 2013.
Case below, 214 Cal.App.4th 1322, 155 Cal.Rptr.3d 128.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.