General
Pensick & Gordon, Inc., v. California Motor Express et al.
372 U.S. 903·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 222.
Pensick & Gordon, Inc., v. California Motor Express et al.
Carl M. Gould for petitioner.
Theodore W. Bussell, George Catlin, Walt A. Steiger and Joseph P. Loeb for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
The joint motion to recall and amend the judgment of this Court is granted. It is ordered that the certified copy of the judgment sent to the District Court be recalled and that such judgment be vacated. It is further ordered that the order entered in this case on December 3,1962, 371 U. S. 184, is amended to provide for a remand of the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.