General
William MACKENTOSH, Petitioner, v. R. H. EGGLESTON, Trustee, etc., et al., Respondents
17 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William MACKENTOSH, Petitioner, v. R. H. EGGLESTON, Trustee, etc., et al., Respondents.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
October 18, 1926.)
No. 295, Original.
Petition to Revise Order of District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma.
Ross & Thurman, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for petitioner.
■ Thomas J. Wingfield, of Birmingham, Ala., and Joe D. Morse and Hough E. Tyson, both of Oklahoma City, Okl., for respondents.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Petition to revise dismissed, at costs of petitioner, on motion of petitioner, with stipulation of settlement.