Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. King et al., Members of Florida Railroad & Public Utilities Commission, et al., 1956 — 350 U.S. 989 · caselaw · US
General
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. King et al., Members of Florida Railroad & Public Utilities Commission, et al.
350 U.S. 989·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 669.
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. King et al., Members of Florida Railroad & Public Utilities Commission, et al.
Charles Cook Howell for petitioner. Lewis W. Petteway for King et al., and Earle B. Askew for the City of St. Petersburg, Florida, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of Florida. Certiorari denied.