General
Herman ARTHUR v. STATE
21 Ala. App. 659107 So. 924·Alabama Court of Appeals·1926·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(107 So. 924)
Herman ARTHUR v. STATE.
(7 Div. 130.)
(Court of Appeals of Alabama.
Feb. 16, 1926.)
Appeal from Circuit Court, De Kalb County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.
Isbell & Scott, of Ft. Payne, for appellant. Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for tbe State.
[MAJORITY — BRICKEN, P. J.]
BRICKEN, P. J.
We have carefully examined all the evidence adduced upon the trial of this case, as shown by the record. It was totally insufficient to warrant, the conviction of this appellant, and in overruling the defendant’s motion to exclude the evidence the court committed reversible error. Under the whole evidence, the defendant was entitled to his discharge. Reversed and remanded.